Very interesting article from McAfee: “Mapping the mal web“. It contains statistics on the chances to find malware on the web depending on the country of origin (according to the TLD) It’s worth it to take a look at it. The main conclusions are:
- The most risky large countries are Romania (.ro, 5.6% risky sites) and Russia (.ru, 4.5% risky sites). These country TLDs are also the most likely to host exploit sites.
- .info is the riskiest generic TLD, with 7.5% of its sites rated as risky. .com is the second most risky generic TLD, with 5.5% of sites rated as risky.
- Four of the five least risky country TLDs are Nordic countries - Finland (0.10%), Norway (.no, 0.16%), Sweden (.se, 0.21%) and Iceland (.is, 0.19%). Ireland (.ie, 0.11%) rounds out the top five least risky country TLDs.
- .gov is the only frequently tested TLD for which SiteAdvisor has found no risky sites. .gov is only available to United States government agencies.
- Even though the .com TLD is only the 5th most risky TLD by rank, its huge popularity magnifies its impact on search and browsing risk dramatically. 86.6% of clicks to red and yellow rated sites go to .com sites.
- Even though the Netherlands (.nl), Germany (.de) and the United Kingdom (.uk) are all relatively safe TLDs, ranking 31st, 33rd and 51st most risky, each of their TLDs account for more than 2 million clicks to red and yellow sites every month. Likewise Japan (.jp) is ranked 57th most risky and yet red and yellow rated .jp sites receive an estimated 1.6 million clicks each month.
The authors offer an interactive map to graphically show the different rates of malware occurrence per country.
The information is gathered from SiteAdvisor, which is a free tool available for Internet Explorer and Firefox which tests the websites the user visits, and checks for spyware, spam, viruses and scams.
I’m sure everyone assumes spam is worth it for spammers. They wouldn’t do it otherwise, right? Of course, the same could be said of the traditional 



